Excerpts from Peter Hutterer's message of Tue Sep 29 22:15:21 -0700 2009: > miGlyphs seems to deal with 0-width glyphs just fine
I guess I don't understand how this can be --
ProcRenderCompositeGlyphs passes all of the glyphs to CompositeGlyphs
which just calls down to the Glyphs function. If that is miGlyphs,
you've got a loop that looks like:
while (n--)
{
glyph = *glyphs++;
pPicture = GlyphPicture (glyph)[pScreen->myNum];
...
(uses of pPicture)
}
I don't see how pPicture won't end up as NULL for zero-sized glyphs,
which should yield a nice segfault.
Am I missing something obvious here?
--
[email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
