On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 11:26 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:

> >  Hmm, right. The two hunks above were aimed towards my first approach for
> >  fixing radeon KMS on big endian machines, by making the root window
> >  visual BGRA. I've since abandoned that approach for a different one, so
> >  those hunks are not needed anymore and obviously even harmful. I'll
> >  submit a patch to revert them.
> 
> Well, it would be nice if a solution to support BGRA properly would be
> found.  I have an i128-based card designed for Sun UltraSPARC workstations
> that can't do the byteswaps in hardware like the radeons can.

Not that you're wrong (about proper BGRA support), but I think you may
be wrong (about i128).  I'd like to see an X log from that chip with
Option "Debug" "on" in xorg.conf, I suspect CMD_HDF and MWn_CTRL will be
interesting.

- ajax


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
xorg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to