Excerpts from Jeremy Huddleston's message of Tue Oct 13 12:59:19 -0700 2009: > Hi Keith, > > Can you please pull these two commits into master: > > 6980f77892e0409b44bd8f33ba82e7273c6462a4 > 7e178ffbed7c8557faf8d471ad275aa2b0365e1d > > I'm still waiting on Peter's "best git practices" documentation before > making my apple feature tree.
In general, I think the idea was that patches be merged to master, tested there, and then pulled back to the version branches. Is there some reason you're doing this kind of development and testing on the 1.7 branch instead of from master? Are you finding master too unstable to be used for this kind of development? As we work on refining our source management policies, it would be useful to get feedback on how things are working for developers and maintainers. Ideally, I'd like to see you maintaining a branch or repository off of the master X server branch and be I'd merging rather than cherry-picking patches to master. -- [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
