On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 16:07 +0100, Matthias Hopf wrote: > On Jan 05, 10 20:20:52 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > There seems to be some confusion in libXrandr as to what a Status return > > value is supposed to mean. Some functions just return rep.status (so 0 > > means success, non-0 failure), others return True (non-0, success) or > > False (0, failure). > > > > Could the return value of the functions returning True/False be changed > > to Bool without breaking ABI? Any other ideas for cleaning this up? > > Those functions I found to return rep.status have the type Status > already.
Sure, the problem is functions which declare a Status (Success/...) return value but effectively return a Bool (False/True) value. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.vmware.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
