On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 11:09 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Keith Packard <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:04:45 -0500, Adam Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm not even really sure what "direct rendered GLX" means in the context > >> of Xinerama. I can see a plausible definition if all the GPUs are of > >> similar enough programming family that they can be driven by the same > >> DRI driver logic (all R800, for example), but if you're heterogeneous... > >> Direct rendered TFP would still require getting the GEM handle for the > >> pixmap to cross DRM device boundaries, even if you're homogeneous. > > > > Yeah, I'd say that we should try to get AIGLX working and then consider > > whether we could make homogeneous direct rendering work sometime later. > > Couldn't we use glxproxy in the short term? IIRC, it worked under dmx.
The glxProxy code in Xdmx literally just repeats the GLX wire protocol to the backend X servers. It is not itself a renderer, nor is it especially adaptable for client-side use. - ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
