On Feb 3, 2010, at 10:12, Dirk Wallenstein wrote:

On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:44:48 -0800 Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
I'd prefer to see this written as:

(1L<<7) - 1L

If it's a value I'd like to have it in sync with the code for easy
comparison. I can change both if you like. Alternatively I could use the
OR-ed other masks.


I think (next - 1) is less prone to human error when adding bits in the future. That's my main concern.

I think OR-ing all the others does not scale well and also suffers from the same human-error aspect.

Consistency is great. Add the change to the header as well, I think that's a good idea.

Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston <[email protected]>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
xorg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to