On 02/04/2010 06:57 AM, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 05:04:17PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > >> On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:39:26 -0500, Eamon Walsh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I chose option (3) and renamed the requests. The SELinux extension >>> doesn't have a traditional Xlib client side that needs to be changed, >>> only XCB support. I have an XCB patch ready to alias the old names. >>> >> Yeah, these seem good to me now. I know the kernel developers would like >> to see the patch sequence refactored so that the name changes occurred >> together, but I'm not sure I care that much as long as the final result >> looks good (and the intermediate versions build and run fine). >> > As long as it doesn't break bisecting, I guess. > > Cheers, > Daniel >
All the patches will bisect OK. Feel free to cherry-pick out of my tree if you want to reorder them. Please merge soon though, because I need to backport the version bump to 1.7. -- Eamon Walsh National Security Agency _______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
