On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 11:11 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > On Feb 23, 2010, at 11:07, Keith Packard wrote: > > > On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:37:18 -0500, Gaetan Nadon > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> This patch will ensure the xserver continues to suppress the > >> optimization, based on strict aliasing rules, after the option > >> is removed from $CWARNFLAGS. There is no change in the object > >> code produced. > > > > I don't think we need to allow any of the code in the X server to be > > 'optimized' in this fashion, so I don't see a need to allow for > > per-directory selection. > > It would be helpful if I had the option to remove this flag from > XQuartz.
Out of curiosity, what significant benefit have you measured from using -fstrict-aliasing? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.vmware.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
