Hi, On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 04:36:05PM +0100, Bradley T. Hughes wrote: > On 03/01/2010 04:26 PM, ext Matthew Ayres wrote: >> To me this sounds almost to be saying that touch events should be >> handled no differently than mouse events, but that doesn't seem right. A >> mouse is >> always present, it always has a position. A touch-sensitive slave/physical >> device may always be attached, but unless something is touching it, isn't it >> essentially absent? > > Yes, essentially. This could be where the sub-device idea comes in. The > physical device is there, but here are no active points generating > events. As it stands today, the last touch leaves the X pointer in the > location of the last touch, and that can generate Enter/Leave events > should the window structure under the pointer changes.
Er, Xi has (had?) ProximityIn/ProximityOut events which told you exactly this ... Cheers, Daniel
pgpeUc0TihKik.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
