On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:32:44 +0100 (CET)
Mark Kettenis <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:21:50 -0800
> > From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
> > 
> > We need to track invalid targets as well as 0 targets, so just make it
> > unsigned so our comparisons work like they should.
> 
> This not only changes signedness, but also makes it 32-bit, at least
> on 32-bit systems.  Was that a conscious decision?

Oops, no.  The spec wants it to be 64 bit.  I'll repost with a correct
commit message and use int64_t or similar.

Thanks,
-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to