On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 16:06:30 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:08:55AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > Due to the checks in configure, this means it gets priority over HAL if > > libudev is found. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> > > --- > > Is it time yet to ring the bells on HAL? Fedora's been building with udev > > enabled for quite a while now and IIRC Debian for even longer. > > > > I think switching to udev as the default for 1.8 is a good idea. > > As long as Debian testing and Lucid or whatever are shipping a > reasonable version of udev by then, sure. > Debian unstable has been using (a previous version of) this code since January 7th, Debian testing since January 27th, and Ubuntu lucid since December 7th, AFAICT. Other than a couple of initial glitches (which got fixed upstream) it seems to be working fine.
Cheers, Julien _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
