On 2010-03-25 19:12, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:43:46AM -0400, Peter Harris wrote:
>>
>> Mariusz got about as far as specifying most of XKB in xcb/proto.
>> Unfortunately, XKB is unlike most of the rest of the extensions, and
>> required additional syntax to be able to specify it. libxcb doesn't know
>> how to generate code from the new XSD yet, because he ran out of time.
> Thanks for the summary. I think XInput suffers from a similar issue with
> some requests requiring new syntax/libxcb parts to be parsed correctly. Is
> this still correct?
I haven't looked in detail, but I believe XInput can be specified using
the syntax introduced for XKB. So still waiting for libxcb support, but
it shouldn't require anything beyond what XKB already requires AFAIK.
Peter Harris
--
Open Text Connectivity Solutions Group
Peter Harris http://connectivity.opentext.com/
Research and Development Phone: +1 905 762 6001
[email protected] Toll Free: 1 877 359 4866
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
