On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 04:25 -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On 2010-04-13 17:17, Gaetan Nadon wrote: > > It's not because of your patch, but can you check where BUILD_PDFDOC > > might be set? > > It would be too complicated if there were too many switches for the same > > function. > > Actually I had been wondering the same thing; AFAICS that variable is > not set anywhere. I presume it is left over from some previous code > churn, but I'll have to look further into it to be sure. >
It's been introduced here: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/util/macros/commit/?id=bcd763dd427d2afd9066d52990363398d15d2c6a It looks like it never worked. > > Yaakov > Cygwin/X > _______________________________________________ > [email protected]: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
