On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:57:37PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:15:07PM +0200, ext Daniel Stone wrote: > > Do you have hard numbers on what it's actually saving, particularly as > > to whether it affects the number of pages that actually get accessed > > rather than the on-disk size? > > Pick the linux kernel. Compile with all modules. Modules builtin. Okay, it's > cooked. Use for all kind of devices. There we have the exactly the current > Xorg without these options. > > For me seems so obvious to conditionalize code that I don't use. I understand > that we'll be introducing complexity here, but it's must. IMHO the only thing > to discuss is _how_ we should do it, trying to minimize such complexity. > > Or Am I missing something very hardly obvious?
Hi, So ajax is pretty much dead on the money, but the other thing here is the scale: dani...@tempa:~/src/linux-2.6(cfb2bb9...)% wc -l **/*.[ch] | tail -1 11114827 total dani...@tempa:~/x/xorg/xserver(master*)% wc -l **/*.[ch] | tail -1 569393 total Not to mention that we already cut out all the drivers, so the remains are only core code. Cheers, Daniel
pgpd03aKrYOlP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
