On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:15:05 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/4/15 Keith Packard <[email protected]>: > > On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:30:55 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Oh, I was thinking I could just allocate the ID, but not actually add > >> the Pixmap as a resource. Is that bad form? > > > > It wouldn't help -- you need FreeResource to be invoked on that XID to > > get the other resources with that XID to be freed as well. > > No, pbuffers are client resources and gets cleaned up when the client > exits. The pixmap used behind these scenes is references from the > pbuffer and when that goes away, the pixmap goes away. The reason I > want to give the pixmap an XID is that DRI2 will create a DRI2 > drawable and add it as a resource with the XID of the pixmap. That's > the only reason the pixmap needs an ID, it gets cleaned up just fine > as it is.
So how is the DRI2 drawable going to get cleaned up? From what I understand, it gets destroyed when FreeResource is called on the drawable ID. -- [email protected]
pgphNMRoRkHLV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
