On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Aaron Plattner <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 06:07:14AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote: >> A while back Peter asked me about helping him add autotools support >> after he pulled xtest out of cvs into git. We got that handled pretty >> quickly, but I decided to spend some time making it actually easy to >> use. So, I give you the revamped XTS: >> >> git://people.freedesktop.org/~dbn/xtest.git > > Dan, is xtest really licensed under the "Artistic" license? I have some > changes pending to clean up a whole lot of warnings, but I just noticed > this term in the license: > > 3. You may otherwise modify your copy of this Package in any way, > provided that you insert a prominent notice in each changed file > stating how and when you changed that file, [...] > > I'd like to avoid having to go through and add a change note to all 551 > files I've touched so far.
I think the Artistic license applies to the bundled tet code (the test platform) in src/. This is what License says. However, everything under xts5 (the test suite itself) appears to be under the X11 license. So, if you've kept your modifications to xts5/, you're OK. Of course, now it appears I'll have to do that to address the hacking I did to the test platform to make it behave reasonably. What a weak license. -- Dan _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
