On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 15:44 +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> +Bool
> +xf86CallDriverProbe( DriverPtr drv, Bool detect_only )
> +{
> + Bool foundScreen = FALSE;
> +
> + if ( drv->PciProbe != NULL ) {
> + if ( xf86DoConfigure && xf86DoConfigurePass1 ) {
> + assert( detect_only );
> + foundScreen = xf86PciAddMatchingDev(drv);
> + }
> + else {
> + assert( ! detect_only );
> + foundScreen = xf86PciProbeDev(drv);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if ( ! foundScreen && (drv->Probe != NULL) ) {
> + xf86Msg( X_WARNING, "Falling back to old probe method for %s\n",
> + drv->driverName );
> + foundScreen = (*drv->Probe)( drv, (detect_only) ? PROBE_DETECT
> + : PROBE_DEFAULT );
> + }
> +
> + return foundScreen;
> +}You're missing some indent levels here. In fact most of this patch seems bizarrely outdented in places. I think your editor is doing something strange. - ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
