On Wed,  5 May 2010 17:54:07 +0200, Peter Korsgaard <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> This is equivalent to the evdev patch sent earlier:

I'd like to see someone from the input team review this before I include
it in the server. In particular, the last I heard, there was a
suggestion that we should use this matrix for relative devices as well,
and either pull out a 2x2 subset or just document that non-affine or
translating transforms probably wouldn't do what you wanted.

-- 
[email protected]

Attachment: pgpHiT9PJi4jc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to