Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp <[email protected]> Of course, now there's only one caller of RRInitOutputPropertyValue; is it worth inlining?
Jamey On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Mikhail Gusarov <[email protected]> wrote: > Reviewed-by: Mikhail Gusarov <[email protected]> > --- > randr/rrproperty.c | 10 +--------- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/randr/rrproperty.c b/randr/rrproperty.c > index 7b8e44e..c4dcb1a 100644 > --- a/randr/rrproperty.c > +++ b/randr/rrproperty.c > @@ -103,18 +103,10 @@ RRCreateOutputProperty (Atom property) > { > RRPropertyPtr prop; > > - prop = (RRPropertyPtr)malloc(sizeof(RRPropertyRec)); > + prop = calloc(1, sizeof(RRPropertyRec)); > if (!prop) > return NULL; > - prop->next = NULL; > prop->propertyName = property; > - prop->is_pending = FALSE; > - prop->range = FALSE; > - prop->immutable = FALSE; > - prop->num_valid = 0; > - prop->valid_values = NULL; > - RRInitOutputPropertyValue (&prop->current); > - RRInitOutputPropertyValue (&prop->pending); > return prop; > } > > -- > 1.7.1 > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected]: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel > _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
