Anybody? I don't want 1.9 to go out with this regression I introduced still in it, please.
Jamey 2010/6/6 Jamey Sharp <[email protected]>: > I got this wrong in e2929db7b737413cf93fbebdf4d15abdfebff05c. > > Signed-off-by: Jamey Sharp <[email protected]> > Cc: Kristian Høgsberg <[email protected]> > --- > This didn't get any review when I posted it a couple of weeks ago. > > glx/glxdriswrast.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/glx/glxdriswrast.c b/glx/glxdriswrast.c > index ac8fd47..54f4440 100644 > --- a/glx/glxdriswrast.c > +++ b/glx/glxdriswrast.c > @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ __glXDRIscreenCreateDrawable(ClientPtr client, > gcvals[0].val = GXcopy; > ChangeGC(NullClient, private->gc, GCFunction, gcvals); > gcvals[1].val = FALSE; > - ChangeGC(NullClient, private->gc, GCFunction | GCGraphicsExposures, > gcvals); > + ChangeGC(NullClient, private->swapgc, GCFunction | GCGraphicsExposures, > gcvals); > > private->driDrawable = > (*driScreen->swrast->createNewDrawable)(driScreen->driScreen, > -- > 1.7.0 > > _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
