On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 07:01 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:14 AM, Julien Cristau <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 08:54:38 -0400, Gaetan Nadon wrote: > > > >> diff --git a/xorg-server.pc.in b/xorg-server.pc.in > >> index 44f886a..898bed2 100644 > >> --- a/xorg-server.pc.in > >> +++ b/xorg-server.pc.in > >> @@ -16,5 +16,6 @@ Name: xorg-server > >> Description: Modular X.Org X Server > >> Version: @PACKAGE_VERSION@ > >> Requires: pixman-1 pciaccess xproto >= 7.0.17 > >> +Requires.private: @REQUIRED_MODULES@ > >> Cflags: -I${sdkdir} @symbol_visibility@ > >> Libs: -L${libdir} > > > > Is all the stuff in REQUIRED_MODULES actually exposed by sdk > > headers? AFAICT it's randr, xext, render, input, xkb and xv protos. > > Yeah, I'd agree. > > Gaeton, maybe you can make a new variable called PC_REQUIRED_MODULES > or something? This would represent required modules exposed in the > pkg-config file. For the optional ones, you'd have something like > this: > > if test "x$XV" = xyes; then > REQUIRED_MODULES="$REQUIRED_MODULES $VIDEOPROTO" > PC_REQUIRED_MODULES="$PC_REQUIRED_MODULES $VIDEOPROTO" > ... >
Sure, will repost. Is the list of sdk exposed modules complete? Is there a mechanical way to find out? Thanks > -- > Dan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
