Twas brillig at 19:16:46 14.06.2010 UTC+03 when [email protected] did gyre and gimble:
>> All the open coded lists in ther server are there now, and they're >> working. If it's not broken, don't mess with it. If you come >> across an error in an open coded list implementation, that would be >> a good reason to port it to list.h. But otherwise, you're just >> almost certainly going to break working code. VT(> I disagree with you Kristian. VT> Pick any code related with clean-up we had done recently; for VT> instance the replacement of the memory allocation function wrappers VT> by the C89 ones. We can say that they were "working", but this VT> wouldn't be an argument to not remove. Especially as this clean-up exposed several hidden bugs. -- http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/
pgpUyJjmLOh3G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
