On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 03:30:03PM +0200, ext Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-D/Helsinki)
> >
> > I'd say to push the first and second of this set to 1.9, given their
> > importance. This third one concerns more clean up, so I'll work a bit more,
> > squash to my tree and eventually we can push later when the merge window is
> > opened.
>
> I don't see any reason to introduce an ABI break for 1.9. We can still
> get the benefit of not calling the expensive pciaccess functions
> without causing any superfluous rebuilds.
that's what I meant, isn't? The first two patches don't introduce ABI
breakage.
Cheers,
Tiago
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
