On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:51:08PM -0400, Keith Packard wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 13:38:53 +1000, Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Unless I specifically tell you, simply ignore any patches that are from me > > or input-related. I do try to send you pull requests, even if it's just one > > or two that need to go on master. > > Ok, cool. Please feel free to chime in on patches that you see on the > list that you'll take; that would make things less ambiguous for me.
will do. I'm just lagging behind by a few days atm. > I would like to see Reviewed-by: lines in your tree though, although > there are sometimes when no-one *can* review them, I realize. I usually wait for reviews, where waiting makes sense. In this particular tree, two of the patches are unlikelyu to ever get one and for things like the "falltrough" comment I figured I dare risk going alone. :) Cheers, Peter > > can you just revert the ones in your tree and then pull in? should save us > > both some time and it won't affect bisecting either. > > That worked great. Good thinking! _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
