From: Dave Airlie <[email protected]> If you didn't call the temp variable for the macro, next, it wouldn't actually work.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <[email protected]> --- include/list.h | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/list.h b/include/list.h index 89dc29d..f80adb0 100644 --- a/include/list.h +++ b/include/list.h @@ -94,10 +94,10 @@ list_is_empty(struct list *head) &pos->member != (head); \ pos = __container_of(pos->member.next, pos, member)) -#define list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next, head, member) \ +#define list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, storage, head, member) \ for (pos = __container_of((head)->next, pos, member), \ - next = __container_of(pos->member.next, pos, member); \ + storage = __container_of(pos->member.next, pos, member); \ &pos->member != (head); \ - pos = next, next = __container_of(next->member.next, next, member)) + pos = storage, storage = __container_of(storage->member.next, storage, member)) #endif -- 1.7.1 _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
