On Mit, 2010-07-07 at 14:59 -0400, Keith Packard wrote: 
> On Wed,  7 Jul 2010 12:38:10 +0200, Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > From: Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Previously we assumed every pixmap destroyed during a software fallback was
> > also created during a software fallback and had access prepared, but that's
> > not always true.
> > 
> > Fixes a server abort reported by 邓逸昕 <[email protected]> .
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>
> > Tested-by: 邓逸昕 <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Would be great if this could make it into 1.9.
> 
> This fixes a bug; is there a bugzilla entry for it? Not that it's
> required, just checking to see if that needs to be included in the
> commit message.

There isn't one, it was reported on the mailing list.

> Also, I wouldn't mind seeing the three copies of identical code placed
> in a shared function somewhere.

I considered that but decided to keep the fix minimal for now.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer           |                http://www.vmware.com
Libre software enthusiast         |          Debian, X and DRI developer
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to