Hi, On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:28:45AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> So at some point you will just have to implement it and throw it out > into the wild. I don't think 1.0 is a good version number to begin > with [...] Why not? Judging by everything I've seen so far, 0.x numbering schemes are always doomed to fail. The simple truth is that you never know which revision will turn out to be the one mature enough to get widespead use. Starting with 0.x just means you will end up with a 0.x version in use forever -- a look at various parts the free software stack provides plenty of proof. You can just as well start with 1.0, and see where you end up. Probably the first version ultimately being used will be 3.7 or something -- so what? In my book, that's still a lot better than 0.17... -antrik- _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
