On 08/19/2010 03:05 PM, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 11:06 +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
Please push after fixing the commit message.
Thanks for catching this.
I won't push the second patch, both the current driver and the legacy
driver are built in the same makefile. No harm done either way. I
would think legacy code should be in a separate directory (vmwlegacy?)
to isolate it from the current driver code.
Thanks, Gaetan.
Actually, the legacy code is most of the code. The current driver code
is just a loader that loads either vmwlegacy_drv.so which is built with
vmware_drv.so, or vmwgfx_drv.so which is built as part of the mesa
distro, depending on wether it's possible to kick vmwgfx_drv.so off.
I've nothing against vmware_drv.so and vmwgfx_drv.so being built in
separate directories, though the current situation where they don't
share the same version number is not optimal. They will probably share
at least a version header in the future.
/Thomas
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
