On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Rami Ylimäki <[email protected]> wrote: ... > You are right in that we mainly care about local clients, because in > practice on our system all clients will be local. But I think that having a > good way to identify local clients is still very important even though we > wouldn't be able to reliably identify remote clients. We don't mind if > information about clients can't be trusted in a rogue environment, because > the framework would be used mainly to improve the overall system quality and > as an development aid, not as a secure client framework for finding out > which clients are trusted. > > -- Rami I agree, I make similar, but much less abstract, changes to help debug problems with local non-trusted clients in a trusted X system.
Your patches are interesting and I plan to review/test them; it might take a few weeks for me to have the time to do that however. What is you time-frame for getting these changes merged? Pat --- _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
