Simon Thum:
2. The pointer acceleration code was highly pointer specific. It heavily
used those valuators.
Yes again - but only in the scheme function. That's just wiring it up
with the pointer - as said, the acceleration context is pretty agnostic
(I'm cooking up a patch to get rid of the last field ATM)
Can you leave me a message when you have cleaned that up? I'll try to
rewrite my patch then.
When will pscroll be adopted? Or will it? When/how is such a decision
made? Will it be soon? If not, what are the problems with pscroll? If
Mostly technical problems AFAIK - it doesn't apply to master and it
seems to collect dust (I may be wrong ITR).
Can anyone else comment on this? The applying itself shouldn't really be
a problem.
Cheers,
Albert
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
