On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Mark Kettenis <[email protected]> wrote: >> From: Mikhail Gusarov <[email protected]> >> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 02:29:19 +0700 >> >> Twas brillig at 21:17:52 13.09.2010 UTC+02 when [email protected] >> did gyre and gimble: >> >> >> so this means we could deprecate XAA from the server, and if one >> >> cares about it we recommend to use old servers? >> >> MK> No. XAA does make a noticable difference on some hardware. >> >> deprecate != remove. There are lots of places in server where signs >> "don't use this for new functionality" could be quite useful. > > But I'm not sure XAA falls into that category. It is my understanding > that EXA doesn't make an awful lot of sense on hardware that doesn't > have alpha support. Such hardware may be mostly irrelevant in the > desktop market, but judging from the discussions on this list in the > last couple of months, such hardware continues to be used in the > embedded space.
Possibly silly question here since I'm not yet familiar with the different accel archs, but is there anyway to merge them so that two archs don't have to be maintained? Or is everything gonna go to Gallium3D and Cairo? Matt _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
