>>>>> "AC" == Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> writes:
AC> Right - I don't know of any OS we support with a shell that doesn't AC> support [] - even the ancient Solaris bourne shell can handle them, AC> and it's usually the cause of many shell workarounds. Back in the day (80's) /usr/bin/[ was a symlink to /usr/bin/test; I see that current coreutils uses a separate binary, though. IOW, even if the shell doesn't support it, there ought to be an [ executable in $PATH. -JimC -- James Cloos <[email protected]> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
