On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:16:32AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:29:24 -0700 > > From: Jesse Adkins <[email protected]> > > > > setsid only fails with EPERM, and it only fails if we're already > > the process leader (which is what would happen if it succeeded). > > > > Patch attached to prevent tab damage > > If you do, please make sure your MUA doesn't encode these as base64. > Difficult to review a diff like the one below:
I honestly have no idea which MUA you're using in 2010 that can't comprehend MIME/base64. mailx?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
