On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 01:28:30AM +0200, ext Adam Jackson wrote: > This attempts to tackle Tiago's (justified) hatred for the IOADDRESS type > in a slightly more elegant way.
much appreciated, ajax! > THIS IS AN ABI BREAK. Like, a pretty massive one. Please do not pull > this yet. I'm mostly looking for r-b's here that the strategy looks > sane. The driver work needs to land before this lands, and it's pretty > trivial, but I don't want to bother unless this is actually going to > merge. as you seen, I didn't give r-b on 3-6 patches of this series. They are the ones that requires driver changes and ABI changes (vgahw and xf86MapLegacyIO called by driver side), and I wasn't comfortable enough yet. Anyway at the first look they seemed to be okay. Let's wait other guys review (Mark Kettenis, for instance :) Would be nice also if you rebase your changes in the top of the PULL request I sent last week (and keith didn't push it yet), because it touches a lot of common code: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2010-September/012951.html Thank you, Tiago _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
