On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 16:43 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > I definitely agree with nuking README.DRIcomp. The others I'm not > going > to object to - if the Registry is neither accurate or being updated it > does seem pointless, and I don't know enough about EXA to know if the > docs just need some updates or are too far from reality to salvage. > It certainly seems like having some documentation of EXA would be > nice. >
Wikipedia has a link to exa-driver.txt (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EXA) X.Org has an ExaStatus wiki that refers to exa-driver.txt There is an EXA(4) man page This text file has not been updated in 5 years. That's all I could that is somewhat relevant.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
