Another place where I don't know the code, but the patch sure looks
like a good idea.

Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp <[email protected]>

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Jesse Adkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Adkins <[email protected]>
> ---
>  hw/xfree86/loader/loader.c |    4 ----
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/xfree86/loader/loader.c b/hw/xfree86/loader/loader.c
> index 8921831..39e0e75 100644
> --- a/hw/xfree86/loader/loader.c
> +++ b/hw/xfree86/loader/loader.c
> @@ -143,10 +143,6 @@ LoaderOpen(const char *module, int *errmaj, int *errmin)
>  {
>     void *ret;
>
> -#if defined(DEBUG)
> -    ErrorF("LoaderOpen(%s)\n", module);
> -#endif
> -
>     xf86Msg(X_INFO, "Loading %s\n", module);
>
>     if (!(ret = dlopen(module, DLOPEN_LAZY | DLOPEN_GLOBAL))) {
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected]: X.Org development
> Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
> Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to