On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 10:50 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > Should we be distributing the doc output in the tarball then? > > Currently, we're not, but that would be a simple update to > > spec/xmlrules.in in libX11. > > Oh, I thought they were, but I didn't actually check. IMO, I'd either > leave the compose key charts out or distribute just the html versions. > Either way, I'd default fop to off. People that really want the pdf or > ps versions of the docs can build them on their own. > >
I am just catching up with all the posts. Are we talking about solving a libX11 problem only, or are we talking about *all* of DocBook XML documentation? I can understand turning off doc build in some cases due to build time. This can be done with XORG_ENABLE_DOCS(no) or XORG_ENABLE_SPECS(no). The conversion to DocBook/XML implies that the xmlto tooling was adequate and available on a reasonable number platforms. Including generated docs (of any kind) in the tarball is a nightmare which still has unresolved problems.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
