On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Keith Packard <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:51:46 +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> - if (slopes[j].dy * slopes[i].dx > slopes[i].dy * slopes[j].dx) >> + if ((long long)slopes[j].dy * slopes[i].dx > (long long)slopes[i].dy * >> slopes[j].dx) > > Looks like the fix is in the right place, but I'd prefer int64_t instead of > 'long long' here. >
Thanks for the review. I have sent a modified patch. -- Siddhesh Poyarekar http://siddhesh.in _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
