On Sam, 2010-10-30 at 12:36 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:07:19 +0200, Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote: > > > Right, but as long as there's at least one rendering operation in > > between, at that point EXA will synchronize the pixmap copies according > > to the accumulated pending damage. That's the assumption broken by your > > change. > > Eric's patch just catches a few non-rendering paths where post-op damage > would not generate Damage events, as DamageRegionProcessPending would > never have been invoked. For all rendering paths, it changes nothing [...]
I know, as I said, the problem is when there's *no* rendering operation between DamageRegionAppend and DamageRegionProcessPending. (IIRC the problem I mentioned with starting compiz from a naked xterm was due to ProcDamageCreate called by compiz) -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.vmware.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
