On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Julien Cristau <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 18:48:43 +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 04:26:38AM +0200, ext Kristian Høgsberg wrote: >> > >> > At this point libxkbcommon only depends on xproto (for keycodes and a few >> > other defines) and kbproto. >> >> it seems that "only" here is a lot actually. I mean, I thought the real >> motivation of the library was to get rid of X11 dependency, so one could use >> for instance with Wayland. Otherwise, it seems that we would be just moving >> code around. So, the plan next is to keep digging towards the X11 removal or >> what? >> > xproto and kbproto are not Xlib. what's the actual problem you're > trying to fix here? "keysym definitions are in the same git tree as x11 > protocol headers" sounds like something one can live with.
I think he wants to remove the X from XKB and have it be a generic keyboard system. But my intention (and I think Daniel's) was just to get Xlib and any other client side stuff out from under XKB. -- Dan _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
