On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Jesse Adkins <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Alan Coopersmith > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thomas Dickey wrote: >>> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Jesse Adkins wrote: >>> >>>> Solaris 9 doesn't have getopt. >>> >>> it has getopt, but doesn't have the nonstandard getopt.h >> >> If I remember correctly, it also doesn't have long option support >> (getopt_long), only traditional getopt. (And a quick grep of the >> headers seems to confirm that.) >> >> On the other hand, Solaris 9 doesn't really have a working render >> implementation, and it's from 2002, so no one is going to be >> putting one there, so I'm tempted to say it's not worth >> complicating the code for everyone else. > I wasn't aware that Solaris 9 was that far back. I should have looked > given the age of the bug. Since it's so old, should I just close the > bug and the patches get ignored?
Yes, probably so. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
