[Due to mail delivery trouble I've missed the previous discussion on this, as
well as pretty much all other mail for the last week, so apologies if I missed
something.]
Rami Ylimäki wrote:
> +The protocol description of X Resource Extension version 1.1 has been
> +either lost or has never been written. This specification documents
> +version 1.1 based on reverse engineered library and server code. In
> +addition to that, a new 1.2 version of the extension is introduced.
The currently shipped protocol is actually 1.0 if you look at the
XResproto.h - the 1.1 in git was solely packaging cleanups and probably
should have been called 1.0.3. Since we made that mistake, it makes
sense for the new version to be 1.2, but the docs should still define 1.0
(and probably mention that 1.1 was the same as 1.0).
A completely random thought: should device grabs be somehow exposed as well
so it's easier to write a client to see who grabbed your mouse and failed to
release it? (Perhaps as a resource with a made-up XID?)
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
