On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:32 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > > -# ifdef USE_PAM > > +# ifdef HAVE_PAM_OPEN_SESSION > > USE_PAM really does seem more descriptive in this case than > HAVE_PAM_OPEN_SESSION though, since it's the whole framework > we care about (and a build-time option to disable), not just > the presence of one function. >
I see. Using the presence of a function to determine the presence of a feature. Version 2 does not replace USE_PAM. I also changed check for SELinux to be consistent, patch #3 version 2.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
