On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Luc Verhaegen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 08:32:18PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 09:29:44PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote: >> > >> > And just how certain are you that 1024x768 is going to help all those >> > cases with missing EDID compared to 800x600? >> >> Because the common case for missing EDID is a device capable of at least >> 1024x768. > > Which will then also happily support 800x600. > > There are fishbowls who only do 800x600, and there are tons of > projectors which will only do 800x600, maybe some of those tiny ones > even do 640x480. > > Really, fishbowl, before i start filing patches for 640x480 baseline for > kms.
Perhaps this is why certain vendors don't want to work with Xorg. We target 1990 hardware to the detriment of modern desktops. Alex _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
