> From: Keith Packard <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:28:08 -0800 > > So, it seems like we have the option of exporting asprintf in our > effective ABI, or changing the name. Of the two, I'd be OK with > exporting asprintf in our ABI, but I don't feel strongly about it. If > someone has a cogent argument against providing asprintf in the ABI we > provide to video or input drivers, I'd love to hear it.
If you're going to export it please do so under a different name. The arguments raised earlier in this thread (by Alan I believe) make a lot of sense. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
