On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:02:28 +0000, Daniel Stone <[email protected]> wrote:
> Or, rather than listing the exact semantics, just state that the > configuration may be changed to attempt to make the CRTC visible in an > implementation-defined manner. Yeah, could do that as well. Given our lack of experience doing any of this, perhaps a bit of maneuvering room would be best. -- [email protected]
pgpSz2DKau4wS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
