On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 20:03 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 01:04:07PM -0500, ext Adam Jackson wrote: > > This can't be right, I don't think. You've eliminated the Map/Unmap > > cycle - entirely laudable, thank you for taking it on - but in doing so > > you're not replacing it with a call path that ever hits ->RealizeWindow, > > so the backing pixmaps aren't ever going to be created. > > > > Am I missing something? > > compCheckRedirect()
Indeed! Right, I'm convinced. This looks much nicer than what we had before. For the series: Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <[email protected]> - ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
