On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 20:45 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:

> On Sun, Jan  2, 2011 at 14:34:49 -0500, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 15:48 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > 
> > > This bit is almost certainly not correct.  The canonical HOST_CPU
> > > value for 64-bit SPARC (aka SPARC V9) is sparc64.
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, I missed this one as I saw a lot of "sparc" strings, but there was
> > only one "sparc64" in the file.
> > 
> > I'll fix it using "sparc | sparc64" as in this config.guess entry:
> > 
> >     sparc:Linux:*:* | sparc64:Linux:*:*)
> >     echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-linux-gnu
> >     exit ;;
> > 
> Or you could just leave it alone?

That's always an option. I am putting some efforts in this script as it
is often the first contact new contributors have with X.Org. You may
recall some of the posts on the list dealing with first time builders.
This time around I asked myself what are the other possible values
implied by the stars? It turns out that 23 out of 29 are useless. 

Back to this example, at the least, sparc* should be used rather that
*sparc* which implies there are values with characters leading the
string. There might also be a reason why config.guess used an '|' rather
than a star.

> 
> Cheers,
> Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to