On 01/06/2011 12:57 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:18:00AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 05:58:07PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>>> +typedef struct _TouchClassRec {
>>> + TouchAxisInfoPtr axes;
>>> + unsigned short num_axes;
>>> + TouchPointInfoPtr touches;
>>> + unsigned short num_touches;
>>> + CARD8 mode; /* ::XIDirectTouch,
>>> XIDependentTouch */
>>> + unsigned int last_touchid;
>>> + int x_axis; /* axis number */
>>> + int y_axis; /* axis number */
>>
>> axis number?? is this to hold the axis index for the x/y axis?
>
> Yeah, it is.
>
>> why not force the implementation to have x/y on 0/1, that's what we do for
>> pointer events too.
>
> *shrug*, it was from Chase's original patch, but to be honest I don't
> really see the harm in being slightly more flexible.
Uhhh... I had it as 0/1 originally, and it was due to one of Peter's
comments that I changed it. Maybe I misunderstood? (Please don't make me
go find the email :)
-- Chase
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
