On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 07:52:54AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 04:02:09PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > I was under the impression that the driver would be handling pointer > > > events and touch events separately. This wording sounds like the server > > > handles pointer emulation internally based on touch data. > > > > > > The current MT code in evdev has separate processing, so which way are > > > we going with this? > > > > Honestly? I don't know. I'd be inclined to say that it'd be more robust > > to do it in the server, so we can get a better association between the > > touch and related pointer events, but certainly the trend in the kernel > > has been to post ABS_[XY] events as well as the MT events, so I'm not > > really sure. > > do pointer emulation for touch events in the server. be that through calling > GPE from GetTouchEvents or other means.
Yeah, that's what we've come around to. More on that soon. Cheers, Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
